From Patrick.Guerin at unine.ch Wed Jan 2 14:13:55 2019 From: Patrick.Guerin at unine.ch (GUERIN Patrick) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:13:55 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear All, I am replying to Carlos Costa's query re vector abundance versus density An abundance signifies a large quantity of something. When the CDC light trap catches a vector in abundance that means the count is high. The quantity of sand flies caught in a light trap or on a wall should, in my opinion, be accounted for by number or count, i.e. vector number or vector count. It is from that number or count that vector density can be estimated - as measured by a particular method (trap), - in a given location (dwelling) or, - for example, at the population level in a given season. All the best with your good work in 2019! Patrick Guerin -----Original Message----- From: leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br [mailto:leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br] On Behalf Of Carlos Costa Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2018 2:56 PM To: Leish-L Subject: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance Dear, What would be better to use: vector abundance or vector density? Capturing vectors on a wall, for instances, may be a direct measurement of vector density, but when capturing in a CDC light trap is sounds better to me to use vector abundance. What do the entomologists and epidemiologists think? Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! Carlos. -- Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. President Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* *64001-450 Teresina-PI* *Brazil* Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), +55 86 3221-3062 (W), +55 86 3237-1075 (H). Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. _______________________________________________ Leish-l mailing list Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l -- This email was sent by icb.usp.br From thiagovasconcelos at iec.gov.br Wed Jan 2 14:59:36 2019 From: thiagovasconcelos at iec.gov.br (Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:59:36 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] RES: vector density or abundance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7828D09A1BC6F040ABD4A545DD1757F3488A0A48@iecmail02.iec.local> Interesting question, Carlos! In theory, flight interception traps (e.g.: adhesive sheets) are less biased towards baited traps (e.g.: light and lure traps), providing a more real picture on fly's density, since each species (with intra/interespecific heterogeneity) can respond differently to the bait. Capturing on a wall sounds to provide as well biasing results in terms of different equipment used and individual/professional dexterity. Although light-baited suction traps are one of the most widely used tools for vector surveillance, they have limitations in terms of their effect on collection efficiency, population data, and pathogen detection (McDermott & Mullens, 2018). For instance, heterogeneity on battery charge, light amperage or fan rotation may significantly change results, avoiding reproducibility. Fly's navigation is also dependent to several factors, such as natural (moon) and human-made lighting. Statistically-based estimation by Standardized Index of Species Abundance can be useful, but results will depend on the proper sampling. We encourage entomologists to use a combined trapping methodological approaching to promote a broader and well-covered sample and properly answer questions and prove the hypothesis-driven about density/ abundance (Vasconcelos dos Santos et al. 2018) McDermott EG, Mullens BA. The dark side of light traps. J Med Entomol. 2018;55:251?61. Vasconcelos Dos Santos T, Pr?vot G, Ginouv?s M, Duarte R, Silveira FT, P?voa MM, Rangel EF. Ecological aspects of Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) and the transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis agents in an Amazonian/ Guianan bordering area. Parasit Vectors. 2018 Nov 29;11(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3190-0. Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos Tecnologista em Pesquisa e Investiga??o Biom?dica Instituto Evandro Chagas - SVS/MS Se??o de Parasitologia; Laborat?rio de Leishmanioses Prof Dr. Ralph Lainson Rodovia BR 316 - Km 07, S/N -Levil?ndia - Cep: 67030.000 Ananindeua-PA? Fone: (91)3214-2003??? www.iec.gov.br -----Mensagem original----- De: leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br [mailto:leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br] Em nome de Carlos Costa Enviada em: domingo, 30 de dezembro de 2018 10:56 Para: Leish-L Assunto: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance Dear, What would be better to use: vector abundance or vector density? Capturing vectors on a wall, for instances, may be a direct measurement of vector density, but when capturing in a CDC light trap is sounds better to me to use vector abundance. What do the entomologists and epidemiologists think? Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! Carlos. -- Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. President Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* *64001-450 Teresina-PI* *Brazil* Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), +55 86 3221-3062 (W), +55 86 3237-1075 (H). Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. _______________________________________________ Leish-l mailing list Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l -- This email was sent by icb.usp.br From elyes.zhioua at gmail.com Wed Jan 2 18:08:52 2019 From: elyes.zhioua at gmail.com (elyes zhioua) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:08:52 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Carlos, Vector density and vector abundance are not related to the trappoing methods. Direct capturing of vectors on a wall or by CDC light traps are both related to abundance. However, mesuring the number of vectros per m? of stick traps placed on a wall is a density. Other than that you are mesuring the abundance. Kind regards Elyes Le mer. 2 janv. 2019 ? 16:23, Carlos Costa a ?crit : > Dear, > > What would be better to use: vector abundance or vector density? > > Capturing vectors on a wall, for instances, may be a direct measurement of > vector density, but when capturing in a CDC light trap is sounds better to > me to use vector abundance. > > What do the entomologists and epidemiologists think? > > Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! > > Carlos. > > -- > Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. > President > Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o > *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* > > *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* > *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* > *64001-450 Teresina-PI* > *Brazil* > Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), > +55 86 3221-3062 (W), > +55 86 3237-1075 (H). > > > Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas > pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? > pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. > Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the > transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, > reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, > please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from > your system. > _______________________________________________ > Leish-l mailing list > Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br > http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l > > -- > This email was sent by icb.usp.br > From bartira at biof.ufrj.br Wed Jan 2 18:26:50 2019 From: bartira at biof.ufrj.br (BARTIRA R BERGMANN) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:26:50 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20190102202652.Horde.zOw8RLWo5wCkrJfUE5t_poz@webmail.biof.ufrj.br> I think a strong cost-benefit study should be carried out before public funds are spent on such a program. Best regards, Bartira Bergmann Citando Geane Oliveira : > Hi Guys!!! > > did you see this??? > > http://www2.camara.leg.br/camaranoticias/noticias/SAUDE/569957-AGRICULTURA-APROVA-VACINACAO-OBRIGATORIA-E-DE-GRACA-CONTRA-LEISHMANIOSE-ANIMAL.html > Agricultura aprova vacina??o obrigat?ria e de gra?a contra leishmaniose > animal > > *What do you think about it???* > > > > *Geane Oliveira* > *Coordena??o de Diagn?stico de Zoonoses e Outras Endemias* > *Laborat?rio de Endemias/LACEN-PE* > *Telefone: (81) 3184 3919 / 3184 3901* > *Celular: (81) 98527 9788 - oi* > > *"Pois eu bem sei os planos que tenho para ti, diz o Senhor, s?o planos de > paz e n?o de mal, para te dar um futuro e uma esperan?a" Jeremias 29:11* > > > Em qua, 14 de nov de 2018 ?s 18:42, Carlos Costa > escreveu: > >> Why leishmaniacs are so silent? Nothing to talk about? Jorge???!!! >> Cheers, >> Carlos. >> >> -- >> Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. >> President >> Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o >> *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* >> >> *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* >> *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* >> *64001-450 Teresina-PI* >> *Brazil* >> Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), >> +55 86 3221-3062 (W), >> +55 86 3237-1075 (H). >> >> >> Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas >> pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? >> pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. >> Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the >> transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, >> reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, >> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from >> your system. >> _______________________________________________ >> Leish-l mailing list >> Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br >> http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l >> >> -- >> This email was sent by icb.usp.br >> > _______________________________________________ > Leish-l mailing list > Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br > http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l > > -- > This email was sent by icb.usp.br -- Bartira Rossi Bergmann Instituto de Biof?sica Carlos Chagas Filho Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - Brasil tel: +55 (21) 2260-6963 From chncosta at gmail.com Wed Jan 2 20:14:59 2019 From: chncosta at gmail.com (Carlos Costa) Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:14:59 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance In-Reply-To: <7828D09A1BC6F040ABD4A545DD1757F3488A0A48@iecmail02.iec.local> References: <7828D09A1BC6F040ABD4A545DD1757F3488A0A48@iecmail02.iec.local> Message-ID: Thanks, Thiago. Very good explanation and citations. Em qua, 2 de jan de 2019 ?s 13:59, Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos < thiagovasconcelos at iec.gov.br> escreveu: > Interesting question, Carlos! > In theory, flight interception traps (e.g.: adhesive sheets) are less > biased towards baited traps (e.g.: light and lure traps), providing a more > real picture on fly's density, since each species (with > intra/interespecific heterogeneity) can respond differently to the bait. > Capturing on a wall sounds to provide as well biasing results in terms of > different equipment used and individual/professional dexterity. Although > light-baited suction traps are one of the most widely used tools for vector > surveillance, they have limitations in terms of their effect on collection > efficiency, population data, and pathogen detection (McDermott & Mullens, > 2018). For instance, heterogeneity on battery charge, light amperage or fan > rotation may significantly change results, avoiding reproducibility. Fly's > navigation is also dependent to several factors, such as natural (moon) and > human-made lighting. Statistically-based estimation by Standardized Index > of Species Abundance can be useful, but results will depend on the proper > sampling. > We encourage entomologists to use a combined trapping methodological > approaching to promote a broader and well-covered sample and properly > answer questions and prove the hypothesis-driven about density/ abundance > (Vasconcelos dos Santos et al. 2018) > > McDermott EG, Mullens BA. The dark side of light traps. J Med Entomol. > 2018;55:251?61. > > Vasconcelos Dos Santos T, Pr?vot G, Ginouv?s M, Duarte R, Silveira FT, > P?voa MM, Rangel EF. Ecological aspects of Phlebotomines (Diptera: > Psychodidae) and the transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis > agents in an Amazonian/ Guianan bordering area. Parasit Vectors. 2018 Nov > 29;11(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3190-0. > > Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! > > Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos > Tecnologista em Pesquisa e Investiga??o Biom?dica > Instituto Evandro Chagas - SVS/MS > Se??o de Parasitologia; Laborat?rio de Leishmanioses Prof Dr. Ralph Lainson > Rodovia BR 316 - Km 07, S/N -Levil?ndia - Cep: 67030.000 > Ananindeua-PA Fone: (91)3214-2003 www.iec.gov.br > > > > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br [mailto: > leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br] Em nome de Carlos Costa > Enviada em: domingo, 30 de dezembro de 2018 10:56 > Para: Leish-L > Assunto: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance > > Dear, > > What would be better to use: vector abundance or vector density? > > Capturing vectors on a wall, for instances, may be a direct measurement of > vector density, but when capturing in a CDC light trap is sounds better to > me to use vector abundance. > > What do the entomologists and epidemiologists think? > > Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! > > Carlos. > > -- > Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. > President > Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o > *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* > > *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* > *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* > *64001-450 Teresina-PI* > *Brazil* > Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), > +55 86 3221-3062 (W), > +55 86 3237-1075 (H). > > > Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas > pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? > pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. > Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the > transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, > reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, > please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from > your system. > _______________________________________________ > Leish-l mailing list > Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br > http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l > > -- > This email was sent by icb.usp.br > -- Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. President Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* *64001-450 Teresina-PI* *Brazil* Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), +55 86 3221-3062 (W), +55 86 3237-1075 (H). Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. From chncosta at gmail.com Thu Jan 3 08:50:59 2019 From: chncosta at gmail.com (Carlos Costa) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 10:50:59 -0000 Subject: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance In-Reply-To: References: <7828D09A1BC6F040ABD4A545DD1757F3488A0A48@iecmail02.iec.local> Message-ID: One thing is the concept of density and abundance and the other is practical. Density is a measure of abundance given the volume or area from which we make the inferences are specified. However, they are not synonymous. Abundance is a more general concept that should be applied broadly to denote a quantity of something. However, it encloses the concept of density, which is a more strict physical concept to define a quantity contained in a specified space, bi- or tridimensional. Density is an estimation of abundance, aiming usually to calculate, in our case, a measure of host-vector interaction, that is, with traps, any trap. Therefore, it sounds that we might use abundance when not specifying a particular space: "The importance of vector *abundance* and seasonality..." and density to the methods for the estimation of abundance: "Vector *density* gradients and the epidemiology of urban malaria in...". The following issue is to estimate abundance from density in a way it would indicate a less biased vector-host contact, particularly the biting rate and the entomological inoculation rate. And this is the challenge since vector density changes with the place, time, and the method. For sand flies, it is quite intriguing and hard to estimate since it also changes with temperature, rain, humidity and, mostly, to host species and distance. A hard challenge that I am trying to grasp the results of an experiment. Thanks to all for your hints, teaching, and ideas. Should never stop to try to learn from the older savant and from the smart youth. Em qua, 2 de jan de 2019 ?s 19:14, Carlos Costa escreveu: > Thanks, Thiago. Very good explanation and citations. > > > Em qua, 2 de jan de 2019 ?s 13:59, Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos < > thiagovasconcelos at iec.gov.br> escreveu: > >> Interesting question, Carlos! >> In theory, flight interception traps (e.g.: adhesive sheets) are less >> biased towards baited traps (e.g.: light and lure traps), providing a more >> real picture on fly's density, since each species (with >> intra/interespecific heterogeneity) can respond differently to the bait. >> Capturing on a wall sounds to provide as well biasing results in terms of >> different equipment used and individual/professional dexterity. Although >> light-baited suction traps are one of the most widely used tools for vector >> surveillance, they have limitations in terms of their effect on collection >> efficiency, population data, and pathogen detection (McDermott & Mullens, >> 2018). For instance, heterogeneity on battery charge, light amperage or fan >> rotation may significantly change results, avoiding reproducibility. Fly's >> navigation is also dependent to several factors, such as natural (moon) and >> human-made lighting. Statistically-based estimation by Standardized Index >> of Species Abundance can be useful, but results will depend on the proper >> sampling. >> We encourage entomologists to use a combined trapping methodological >> approaching to promote a broader and well-covered sample and properly >> answer questions and prove the hypothesis-driven about density/ abundance >> (Vasconcelos dos Santos et al. 2018) >> >> McDermott EG, Mullens BA. The dark side of light traps. J Med Entomol. >> 2018;55:251?61. >> >> Vasconcelos Dos Santos T, Pr?vot G, Ginouv?s M, Duarte R, Silveira FT, >> P?voa MM, Rangel EF. Ecological aspects of Phlebotomines (Diptera: >> Psychodidae) and the transmission of American cutaneous leishmaniasis >> agents in an Amazonian/ Guianan bordering area. Parasit Vectors. 2018 Nov >> 29;11(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3190-0. >> >> Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! >> >> Thiago Vasconcelos dos Santos >> Tecnologista em Pesquisa e Investiga??o Biom?dica >> Instituto Evandro Chagas - SVS/MS >> Se??o de Parasitologia; Laborat?rio de Leishmanioses Prof Dr. Ralph >> Lainson >> Rodovia BR 316 - Km 07, S/N -Levil?ndia - Cep: 67030.000 >> Ananindeua-PA Fone: (91)3214-2003 www.iec.gov.br >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Mensagem original----- >> De: leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br [mailto: >> leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br] Em nome de Carlos Costa >> Enviada em: domingo, 30 de dezembro de 2018 10:56 >> Para: Leish-L >> Assunto: [Leish-l] vector density or abundance >> >> Dear, >> >> What would be better to use: vector abundance or vector density? >> >> Capturing vectors on a wall, for instances, may be a direct measurement of >> vector density, but when capturing in a CDC light trap is sounds better to >> me to use vector abundance. >> >> What do the entomologists and epidemiologists think? >> >> Best wishes and a fruitful 2019! >> >> Carlos. >> >> -- >> Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. >> President >> Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o >> *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* >> >> *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* >> *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* >> *64001-450 Teresina-PI* >> *Brazil* >> Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), >> +55 86 3221-3062 (W), >> +55 86 3237-1075 (H). >> >> >> Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, >> protegidas >> pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? >> pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. >> Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the >> transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, >> reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, >> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from >> your system. >> _______________________________________________ >> Leish-l mailing list >> Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br >> http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l >> >> -- >> This email was sent by icb.usp.br >> > > > -- > Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. > President > Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o > *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* > > *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* > *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* > *64001-450 Teresina-PI* > *Brazil* > Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), > +55 86 3221-3062 (W), > +55 86 3237-1075 (H). > > > Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, > protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas > exclusivamente ? pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. > Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the > transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, > reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, > please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from > your system. > -- Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc. President Instituto de Doen?as do Sert?o *Instituto de Doen?as Tropicais Natan Portella* *Centro de Ci?ncias da Sa?de da Universidade Federal do Piau?* *Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul* *64001-450 Teresina-PI* *Brazil* Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W), +55 86 3221-3062 (W), +55 86 3237-1075 (H). Aviso: As informa??es contidas nesta mensagem s?o CONFIDENCIAIS, protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas exclusivamente ? pessoa ou organiza??o para a qual a mensagem foi destinada. Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission. It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration, reproduction, and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your system.