[Leish-l] Fwd: Leishmaniasis - sand fly or sandfly or sand-fly?

Carlos Brisola Marcondes cbrisolamarcondes at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 15:07:42 BRST 2016


Dear all
   OK, sand fly is probably utilized on our side of Atlantic Ocean.
   And in Canada, that is linked to UK, but on the West side?

Carlos Brisola Marcondes

2016-02-18 17:54 GMT-02:00 David, John R. <jdavid at hsph.harvard.edu>:

>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br <leish-l-bounces at lineu.icb.usp.br>
> on behalf of Campos-Neto, Antonio <Acampos at forsyth.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 15, 2016 2:30 PM
> *To:* Carlos Costa; Leish-L
> *Subject:* Re: [Leish-l] Fwd: Leishmaniasis - sand fly or sandfly or
> sand-fly?
>
>
> Well, I have to add the Equator divide to the Atlantic Ocean divide in the
> conversation about sandfly versus sand fly.  Below the Equator and on the
> Western of the Atlantic Ocean, any little thing that flies and bites are
> called erroneously, I recognize, Mosquito, not Flies J.
>
> Fortunately, for our papers we do not have to add this third linguistic
> quandary and have to deal only with the dilemma of sand fly versus sandfly.
>
> Best to all.
>
> acn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Antonio Campos-Neto, MD
>
> Director, Global Infectious Disease Research Center
>
> The Forsyth Institute
>
> 245 First Street
>
> Cambridge, MA 02142
>
> Phone: (617) 892-8393
>
> EM: acampos at forsyth.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Anthony Bryceson* <a.bryceson at doctors.net.uk>
> Date: 2009-03-30 21:06 GMT-03:00
> Subject: Re: [Leish-l] Leishmaniasis - sand fly or sandfly or sand-fly?
> To: BobKillick-Kendrick <killickendrick at wanadoo.fr>
> Cc: Carlos Costa <chncosta at gmail.com>, "Chang, Kwang-Poo" <
> KwangPoo.Chang at rosalindfranklin.edu>, fred opperdoes <
> fred.opperdoes at uclouvain.be>, Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br
>
> The academics have spoken, but us lay writers could be forgiven for
> getting it "wrong". Usage accepts sandfly on this side of the Atlantic. As
> Bob pointed out the divide between sandfly  and sand-fly is the Atlantic
> Ocean. The Oxford English Dictionary and Collins offer only sandfly,
> Webster offers only sand fly. Encyclopedia Britannica uses sand fly, but
> then includes midges and gnats. Wikipedia is utterly confused. Trawling the
> publications of the  famous ento- parasito-logists showed that British
> journals such as TRSTMH use sandfly, Continental journals mostly use
> sandfly when publishing in English, but some such as Parassitologia seem a
> little more flexible and use either. US journals use sand fly, but adopted
> the style at  different times: AJTMH in abut 1983, Science and Mem Inst
> Oswaldo Cruz by about 2000. I found only one sand-fly. So select your
> journal carefully if you have strong feelings.
>
> Anthony Bryceson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Mar 2009, at 07:00, BobKillick-Kendrick wrote:
>
>
>
> The Americans use sand fly. The convention is that two words indicate a
> dipteran - eg. sand fly, tsetse fly, horse fly, stable fly etc, - whereas
> one word indicates a non-dipteran - eg. mayfly, damselfly, hoverfly etc. It
> seems sensible to me and I follow it. [This is opposed by Chris Schofield.
> But he works on reduvidbugs (conenosebugs)!]
>
> Bob Killick-Kendrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Carlos Costa <chncosta at gmail.com>
>
> *To:* Chang, Kwang-Poo <KwangPoo.Chang at rosalindfranklin.edu>
>
> *Cc:* fred opperdoes <fred.opperdoes at uclouvain.be> ;
> Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:46 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Leish-l] Leishmaniasis - Argentina: epidemic potential
>
>
>
> To: all
>
>
>
> By the way, what is the right English writing: sand fly or sandfly? Is it
> a matter of England vs. US?
>
>
>
> Carlos H.
>
> 2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leish-l mailing list
> Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br
> http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lineu.icb.usp.br_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_leish-2Dl&d=CwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=TXJgyFrmoJD97hKiJjMML-cYqdO98xxaeYSCyowQidU&m=hCAYUCEi0zaURlypX6DiyiTbuC13y_mfS0k0wxwMZ7w&s=hV3IKm61m67txXHeWCxEKvUhDwL6OsnFQmjmHQRLRqY&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carlos H. N. Costa, MD, DSc.
>
> Coordenador
>
> Laboratório de Leishmanioses - LabLeish
>
> Universidade Federal do Piauí
>
> Instituto de Doenças Tropicais Natan Portella
>
> Rua Artur de Vasconcelos 151-Sul
>
> 64001-450 Teresina-PI
>
> Brazil
>
> Telephones: +55 86 3222-4377 (W),
>
> +55 86 3221-3062 (W),
>
> +55 86 3237-1075 (R).
>
>
>
>
>
> Aviso: As informações contidas nesta mensagem são CONFIDENCIAIS,
> protegidas pelo sigilo legal, por direitos autorais e destinadas
> exclusivamente à pessoa ou organização para a qual a mensagem foi destinada.
>
> Warning: This message is meant only for the intended recipient of the
> transmission.  It is forbidden any unauthorized use, alteration,
> reproduction and distribution. If you are not the correct recipient, please
> notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this message from your
> system.
>
>
>
> --
> *This email was sent by icb.usp.br <http://icb.usp.br> *  ­­
>
>
> --
> *This email was sent by icb.usp.br <http://icb.usp.br> *  ­­
>
>
> --
> * This email was sent by icb.usp.br <http://icb.usp.br> *   ­­
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leish-l mailing list
> Leish-l at lineu.icb.usp.br
> http://lineu.icb.usp.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/leish-l
>
> --
> This email was sent by icb.usp.br
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lineu.icb.usp.br/pipermail/leish-l/attachments/20160219/44e85aca/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Leish-l mailing list